• E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2024

    6.713

    Impact Factor 2023

    6.464

  • E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2024

    6.713

    Impact Factor 2023

    6.464

  • E-ISSN:

    2454-9584

    P-ISSN

    2454-8111

    Impact Factor 2024

    6.713

    Impact Factor 2023

    6.464

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INVENTIONS IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY

International Peer Reviewed (Refereed), Open Access Research Journal
(By Aryavart International University, India)

Paper Details

Leveraging the Hybrid Approach in Using Algorithms to Efficaciously Analyse Sentiments

Naman Verma

Paramount International School, Dwarka, New Delhi

78 - 81 Vol. 6, Issue 1, Jan-Dec, 2020
Receiving Date: 2020-04-02;    Acceptance Date: 2020-05-05;    Publication Date: 2020-05-15
Download PDF

Abstract

The main part of data gathering is focusing on people's thought processes. Various review assets, for example, online audit sites and individual websites, are available. In this paper, we focus on Twitter. Twitter permit a client to communicate their perspective on different meanings. We performed opinion research on tweets using Text Mining techniques like Lexicon and AI Approach. We performed Sentiment Analysis in two stages; first, via looking through the extremity words from the bag of words as of now predefined in the vocabulary word reference. Second, train the AI algorithm using polarities given in the initial step.

    References

  1. Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., & Stede, M. 2011. “Lexicon- based methods for sentiment analysis.” Comput. Linguist. 37, (2): 267—307.
  2. Hu, M., & Liu, B. 2004. “Mining and summarizing customer reviews. “ In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 168--177.
  3. Kim, S., & Hovy, E. 2004. Determining the sentiment of opinions. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING '04). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA
  4. Ding, X., Liu, B., & Yu, P.S. 2008. “A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining.” In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining (WSDM '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA. pp. 231-240.
  5. Pang, B., Lee, L., and Vaithyanathan, S. (2002).” Thumbs up?: Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques”. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - Volume 10, EMNLP ’02, pages 79–86, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  6. Multi Perspective Question Answering (MPQA). Online Lexicon “http://www.cs.pitt.edu/mpqa/subj_lexicon.html.
  7. Stefano Baccianella, Andrea Esuli, Fabrizio Sebastiani. “SENTIWORDNET 3.0: An Enhanced Lexical Resource for Sentiment Analysis s and Opinion Mining”. In Proceedings of international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 2010.
  8. Wiebe, J. and Rilo_, E. 2005. “Creating Subjective and Objective Sentence Classifiers from Unannotated Texts. “ CICLing 2005
  9. Tan, S., Wang, Y. and Cheng, X. 2008.” combing Learn- based and Lexicon-based Techniques for Sentiment Detection without Using Labeled Examples.” SIGIR 2008
  10. www.cis.uni-muenschen.de/~schmid- tools/TreeTagger/
  11. Multi Perspective Question Answering (MPQA) Online Lexicon
  12. Go, A., Bhayani, & R., Huang, L. 2009. “Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision.” Technical report, Stanford.
  13. Lei Zhang , Riddhiman Ghosh, Mohamed Dekhil, Meichun Hsu, Bing Liu 2011. “Combining Lexicon-based and Learning-based Methods for Twitter Sentiment Analysis”. HPL Laboratories
Back

Disclaimer: Indexing of published papers is subject to the evaluation and acceptance criteria of the respective indexing agencies. While we strive to maintain high academic and editorial standards, International Journal of Inventions in Engineering & Science Technology does not guarantee the indexing of any published paper. Acceptance and inclusion in indexing databases are determined by the quality, originality, and relevance of the paper, and are at the sole discretion of the indexing bodies.